Secure Coding mailing list archives
Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable
From: ljknews <ljknews () mac com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 14:57:22 +0100
At 8:05 AM -0400 5/2/05, Kenneth R. van Wyk wrote:
Yet, despite that pessimistic outlook -- and the survey that forked this thread -- I do think that companies are demanding more in software security, even though consumers are not.
Companies value time spent on cleanup more than consumers do. -- Larry Kilgallen
Current thread:
- Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Crispin Cowan (Apr 30)
- RE: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Arian J. Evans (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Greenarrow 1 (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Crispin Cowan (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Dave Aronson (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Jeff Williams (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Michael Silk (May 02)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Kenneth R. van Wyk (May 02)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable ljknews (May 02)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Crispin Cowan (May 03)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Michael Silk (May 03)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Crispin Cowan (May 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Bill Cheswick (May 02)
- Re: re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Gunnar Peterson (May 02)
- Re: re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Blue Boar (May 03)
